89th Legislature · HB 149

HB 149 explained: What Texas’s new AI law (TRAIGA) bans, and the fines behind it

By Marcus Tate (AI-generated host) · Episode 2 · Facts checked against primary sources Oct 23, 2026

TL;DR

HB 149, the Texas Responsible Artificial Intelligence Governance Act, took effect January 1, 2026. It bars developing or deploying AI meant to push people toward self-harm, violence or crime, or to unlawfully discriminate, and limits how government can use AI. Only the Attorney General can enforce it. Violators get notice and 60 days to fix the problem before a lawsuit, and penalties run up to $200,000 per uncurable violation.

What the bill does

Prohibited uses, for anyone doing business in Texas. The law says a person may not develop or deploy an AI system that intentionally aims to encourage someone to harm themselves (including suicide), harm another person, or commit a crime. It also bars AI built with the intent to unlawfully discriminate against a protected class. The text notes that a “disparate impact” by itself isn’t enough to show intent.

Sexual content involving minors and illegal deepfakes. It prohibits AI developed or distributed with the sole intent of producing child sexual abuse material or illegal sexual deepfakes, as defined in the Penal Code. It also bars text chatbots that imitate a child under 18 in sexual conversations.

Limits on government. State and local government entities can’t use AI for “social scoring,” meaning rating people on their behavior or personal traits in a way that leads to unfair treatment or violates their rights. They also can’t use AI to identify a specific person from biometric data gathered without consent when doing so would violate that person’s rights. A government agency whose AI system talks with the public has to tell people they’re dealing with AI.

Enforcement. The Attorney General has exclusive authority to enforce the law, and it creates no private right to sue. Before filing suit, the AG has to send notice, and the AG can’t sue if the problem is fixed within 60 days.

Violation typeCivil penalty
Curable (or breach of a statement to the AG)$10,000 – $12,000 each
Uncurable$80,000 – $200,000 each
Continuing$2,000 – $40,000 per day

Also in the bill: a regulatory “sandbox” run by the Department of Information Resources, where approved participants can test AI systems for up to 36 months, and a new Texas Artificial Intelligence Council.

Authors & sponsors

Author: Rep. Giovanni Capriglione (R), HD 98

Joint authors: Rep. Angie Chen Button (R), Rep. Greg Bonnen (R), Rep. Angelia Orr (R), Rep. Salman Bhojani (D)

Coauthors: Rep. Cody Harris (R), Rep. Suleman Lalani (D), Rep. John Lujan (R), Rep. Will Metcalf (R), Rep. Mihaela Plesa (D)

Senate sponsor: Sen. Charles Schwertner (R), SD 5

Senate cosponsor: Sen. Royce West (D)

Party labels come from the Texas Legislative Reference Library.

Votes

VoteDateYeas–Nays
House (passed)Apr 23, 2025146–3
Senate (passed, amended)May 23, 202531–0
House concurs in Senate changesMay 30, 2025121–17

Timeline

Mar 14, 2025Filed in the House
Apr 23, 2025Passed the House
May 23, 2025Passed the Senate with amendments
May 30, 2025House agreed to Senate changes
Jun 22, 2025Signed by the Governor
Jan 1, 2026Took effect

Status & what to watch

Status: In effect since January 1, 2026.

What to watch: the Attorney General’s first enforcement actions under the law, and what the sandbox program and AI Council produce.

Sources

AI disclosure: Marcus Tate is an AI-generated host, and the video uses an AI-generated voice and likeness. Scripts and articles are written with AI assistance, and every fact is verified against the primary sources above. We don’t endorse or oppose any bill, party or candidate. Spot an error? Let us know on Facebook and we’ll correct it publicly.
Weekly newsletter: coming soon

“What Texas passed, explained.” Signup isn’t live yet, and this form collects nothing.